Skip to content

1 Corinthians_Unity pt. 2

The last time I shared I wrote that the answer to my reader’s question about whether we should strive for unity with people whose faith is in opposition to ours. How can we achieve unity with people who are simply so far afield from us?

That leads us to what the real question is:
Are those others even Real True Christians?

If we answer in the negative, we are essentially off the hook. “They aren’t part of the Church, so I don’t need to strive for unity with them. Hell, I don’t even need to talk to them!”

When we try to do this we commit the logical fallacy known as the “No True Scotsman” fallacy.
This tack seems to let us proclaim that our brand of (fill in the blank) is what a true (same fill in the blank) looks like. Therefore, any deviation from what we think is (blank again) cannot be a True (fill in the blank).

This reader could then say, “Christians love others. That person doesn’t love everyone. Therefore, that person is not a Real True Christian.”

The argument is a fallacy because one changes the subject without any logical reason to do so. There is no, as some say, a falsifiable fact involved. It’s simply a subjective statement to try and create a false dichotomy.

The fact is, Falwell Jr., Franklin Graham, Bob Jeffress, et al are IN FACT CHRISTIANS!!
We don’t get to make judgments about their faith any more than they get to do that about us.
In fact, these people would come out and say that All Progressive Christians are NOT Real True Christians.

So, what do we do about the seeming disparity in what we believe about God and Jesus?
It appears that the chasm is great and there is no way to bridge it.

Taking Jesus as our Exemplar once again, perhaps we can begin to see a way forward.

Those of us who have read the stories about Jesus, the Gospels, understand that Jesus was not a simple, monochrome person. He was solid as a rock about some things. A little more colorful or even ambivalent about others.
One of the things that he was solid about was that many people who claimed to be leaders of Israel were behaving in ways that God simply was opposed to.
Many of these people tried to confront Jesus and trip him up.
One time when Jesus was eating with so-called “tax collectors and sinners,” those people questioned his judgment about the company he kept.
Jesus said, “It’s the sick who need a physician.”
In the 23rd chapter of the Gospel according to Matthew, Jesus pronounce ‘8 Woes’ upon those same people. He called out their hypocrisy, hate, and bigotry. His language was hard as he pointed out how they erred from the Way of God.
Jesus used Judgment language to denounce cities where the people did not accept the miracles he performed as proof of God’s Presence among them.
These were powerful and hard words.

Yet, at no time did Jesus say that they were not Real True Israelites.

In fact, I think that he was able to use that kind of language with them precisely because they were family.

Jesus example provides us with a way to engage others with whom we disagree. It’s not to point fingers at them and pronounce them “Unclean!”
But, we may engage them and try to show them that there is another way to walk in Faith.
We don’t need to be exclusive and build walls to keep out the “Other.”
In fact, it’s closer to our job description to be demolition experts who tear down walls!

What if those others refuse to listen and rebuff us?
Can we wipe the dust off of our sandals and walk away?

I really wish that I could say, “Yes!!! Just walk away!!!”

I’m not sure that I can say that, though.

Because, I think that there may be a “still more excellent way.”

But, that will need to wait til next time.

For now, perhaps we can reflect on what it means to be members of a dysfunctional family. We have no control over who our siblings are or what they will do.
But, in the end, we ARE still Sisters and Brothers.

Published incommunityethicsFollowing JesusLife and cultureTheology

2 Comments

  1. Fluteplayer1 Fluteplayer1

    Beautifully written my friend. And for the most part I agree with you. I can embrace a lot of pretty crazy stuff for the sake of trying to follow Jesus. I find most doctrinal differences hardly worth breakin a sweat over. Besides, who doesn’t enjoy a good rousing debate now and then. Baptism, rapture, eternal security, faith vs. works and so many more can be overlooked. But what I am having extreme difficulty with is embracing (even for the sake of unity) those who hold to and implement doctrines and beliefs that do damage to fellow believers. Oppressing women by preventing them from assuming their full role as leaders within the church, or teaching that they are flawed simply for being women. Those who still hold to racist attitudes. Those who refuse fellowship to our LGBTQ brothers and sisters, even refusing them membership in the Body of Christ without repenting and renouncing who they are. While I’m at it, let’s consider those who reach into the pockets of the most vulnerable and steal their money by making false promises of present or future blessings. Or false hopes that ultimately leaves them more broken than when they started.
    I want to find solace in your words, Mike. I really do. So I will once again look for a way. Thanks brother.
    Your Reader

    • mhelbert mhelbert

      Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
      Being human is nothing if not messy. And, I find the same difficulties that you do regarding exclusion of people for no other reason that they are “Not Us.”
      Perhaps today’s post will add fuel to the fire. Or, maybe quench one’s thirst.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *